shapeofsoup
  • Monotropic Expansion
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework
    • 1.2 Purpose and Goals
    • 1.3 Monotropic Expansion Model
    • 1.4 Addressing Accessibility
    • 1.5 Paper Overview
    • 1.6 Positionality and Rationale
  • 2. Model Mechanism
    • 2.1 Anchoring
    • 2.2 Iterative Context Building
    • 2.3 Cognitive Inertia
    • 2.4 Directionality and Precision
    • 2.5 Scalability and Flexibility
  • 3. Neurological Foundation
    • 3.1 Salience Anchoring and Internal Relevance
    • 3.2 Attentional Modulation and Cognitive Inertia
    • 3.3 Predictive Coding and Inside-Out Construction
    • 3.4 Neurodevelopmental Trajectories and Structural Divergence
    • 3.5 Implications for Structural Modeling and Neuroethical Practice
  • 4. Theoretical Alignment
    • 4.1 Monotropism (Murray, Lesser, Lawson, 2005)
    • 4.2 Executive Dysfunction and Attentional Flexibility
    • 4.3. Weak Central Coherence (Frith, 1989)
    • 4.4. Theory of Mind (ToM) and the Assumption of Deficiency
    • 4.5. Language Processing and Internal Narrative
    • 4.6. Trauma, Inertia, and Pattern Reinforcement
    • 4.7. Double Empathy Problem (Milton, 2012)
    • 4.8. DSM-5 Framing and Pathologized Comparison
  • 5. Implications
    • 5.1. Diagnostic Framing and the Myth of Functioning Labels
    • 5.2. Coexisting Neurodivergent Conditions and Inertial Structures
    • 5.3. Rethinking Support and Accommodation
    • 5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical Misalignment
    • 5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects
    • 5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction
  • 6. Reframing Autism
    • 6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence
    • 6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language
    • 6.3. Implications for Language, Ethics, and Research
  • 7. Conclusion
  • 8. Update Log
  • Contact & Support
Powered by GitBook
On this page

1. Introduction

Re-envisioning Autism and a Call for Cognitive Emancipation

Autism has long been viewed through a deficit-based lens—defined by what it is presumed to lack rather than understood for how it actually functions. This introductory section outlines the foundational critique that drives this paper, challenging the assumption that observable autistic behaviors reflect dysfunction rather than divergence. It introduces Monotropic Expansion as a neurologically grounded, context-seeking model of cognition—one that reframes autism not as a failure to develop normally, but as a structurally distinct and internally coherent form of focus, meaning-making, and cognitive flow. This section also establishes the paper’s aims: to provide personal cohesion, catalyze professional transformation, foster interpersonal empathy, and support individual empowerment. Finally, it addresses accessibility considerations, clarifies my positionality, and previews the structural arc of the paper—from cognitive mechanism to broader implications for theory, diagnosis, support, and self-understanding.

This document is a living work, intended to evolve alongside new insights, critique, and dialogue. Suggestions for clarification or expansion are welcomed and will be considered in future updates. Contact: shapeofsoup@gmail.com

PreviousMonotropic ExpansionNext1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework

Last updated 2 months ago