shapeofsoup
  • Monotropic Expansion
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework
    • 1.2 Purpose and Goals
    • 1.3 Monotropic Expansion Model
    • 1.4 Addressing Accessibility
    • 1.5 Paper Overview
    • 1.6 Positionality and Rationale
  • 2. Model Mechanism
    • 2.1 Anchoring
    • 2.2 Iterative Context Building
    • 2.3 Cognitive Inertia
    • 2.4 Directionality and Precision
    • 2.5 Scalability and Flexibility
  • 3. Neurological Foundation
    • 3.1 Salience Anchoring and Internal Relevance
    • 3.2 Attentional Modulation and Cognitive Inertia
    • 3.3 Predictive Coding and Inside-Out Construction
    • 3.4 Neurodevelopmental Trajectories and Structural Divergence
    • 3.5 Implications for Structural Modeling and Neuroethical Practice
  • 4. Theoretical Alignment
    • 4.1 Monotropism (Murray, Lesser, Lawson, 2005)
    • 4.2 Executive Dysfunction and Attentional Flexibility
    • 4.3. Weak Central Coherence (Frith, 1989)
    • 4.4. Theory of Mind (ToM) and the Assumption of Deficiency
    • 4.5. Language Processing and Internal Narrative
    • 4.6. Trauma, Inertia, and Pattern Reinforcement
    • 4.7. Double Empathy Problem (Milton, 2012)
    • 4.8. DSM-5 Framing and Pathologized Comparison
  • 5. Implications
    • 5.1. Diagnostic Framing and the Myth of Functioning Labels
    • 5.2. Coexisting Neurodivergent Conditions and Inertial Structures
    • 5.3. Rethinking Support and Accommodation
    • 5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical Misalignment
    • 5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects
    • 5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction
  • 6. Reframing Autism
    • 6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence
    • 6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language
    • 6.3. Implications for Language, Ethics, and Research
  • 7. Conclusion
  • 8. Update Log
  • Contact & Support
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Previous2.1 AnchoringNext2.3 Cognitive Inertia

Last updated 2 months ago

2.2 Iterative Context Building: Layer-by-Layer Expansion

From the anchor, cognition proceeds through deliberate contextual expansion. Each new piece of information is evaluated based on its relationship to the anchored framework and is only integrated if it contributes to internal coherence. This iterative process results in increasingly complex and meaningful structures built from the inside out.

Unlike outside-in processing—which begins with general frameworks or categories—monotropic cognition builds precision first, allowing generalization to emerge only after internal stability is established.

This model helps explain not only the strengths associated with autistic cognition—such as deep understanding and original insight—but also challenges like delayed verbal response or slower adaptation in dynamic environments. These are not signs of dysfunction but reflections of an intensive, self-calibrated process.

It is important to clarify that monotropic expansion is not a fixed or ordered progression through layers of focus. The emergence of contextual detail happens organically—based on how closely new observations or thoughts relate to the original anchor. The model reflects this by emphasizing relational context rather than a rigid hierarchy of depth.

Figure 2.3. Contextual Expansion Rings. A visualization of layered meaning radiating outward from a central anchor. Each concentric ring represents an additional level of emergent context derived from the singular focal point, demonstrating how focus leads to depth rather than breadth.