shapeofsoup
  • Monotropic Expansion
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework
    • 1.2 Purpose and Goals
    • 1.3 Monotropic Expansion Model
    • 1.4 Addressing Accessibility
    • 1.5 Paper Overview
    • 1.6 Positionality and Rationale
  • 2. Model Mechanism
    • 2.1 Anchoring
    • 2.2 Iterative Context Building
    • 2.3 Cognitive Inertia
    • 2.4 Directionality and Precision
    • 2.5 Scalability and Flexibility
  • 3. Neurological Foundation
    • 3.1 Salience Anchoring and Internal Relevance
    • 3.2 Attentional Modulation and Cognitive Inertia
    • 3.3 Predictive Coding and Inside-Out Construction
    • 3.4 Neurodevelopmental Trajectories and Structural Divergence
    • 3.5 Implications for Structural Modeling and Neuroethical Practice
  • 4. Theoretical Alignment
    • 4.1 Monotropism (Murray, Lesser, Lawson, 2005)
    • 4.2 Executive Dysfunction and Attentional Flexibility
    • 4.3. Weak Central Coherence (Frith, 1989)
    • 4.4. Theory of Mind (ToM) and the Assumption of Deficiency
    • 4.5. Language Processing and Internal Narrative
    • 4.6. Trauma, Inertia, and Pattern Reinforcement
    • 4.7. Double Empathy Problem (Milton, 2012)
    • 4.8. DSM-5 Framing and Pathologized Comparison
  • 5. Implications
    • 5.1. Diagnostic Framing and the Myth of Functioning Labels
    • 5.2. Coexisting Neurodivergent Conditions and Inertial Structures
    • 5.3. Rethinking Support and Accommodation
    • 5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical Misalignment
    • 5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects
    • 5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction
  • 6. Reframing Autism
    • 6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence
    • 6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language
    • 6.3. Implications for Language, Ethics, and Research
  • 7. Conclusion
  • 8. Update Log
  • Contact & Support
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Previous2.2 Iterative Context BuildingNext2.4 Directionality and Precision

Last updated 2 months ago

2.3 Cognitive Inertia: The Cost of Redirection

The same deliberateness that fuels monotropic cognition also results in a phenomenon referred to here as contextual inertia. When an individual is forced to shift focus prematurely—before context has stabilized—the mental effort required to discard an incomplete internal map and build a new one from scratch can be significant.

This experience is often misinterpreted as inflexibility, avoidance, or executive dysfunction. Within the Monotropic Expansion framework, it is understood instead as cognitive load incurred by redirection.

Executive function variability, then, becomes more intelligible: tasks that align with a current focus may be executed with extraordinary efficiency, while unrelated tasks may be mentally taxing even when “simple.” The disruption lies not in the task itself, but in the cost of transitioning between incompatible anchors.

Figure 2.4. Context Disruption and Re-Anchoring. This figure illustrates what happens when the expansion process is interrupted. A black arrow indicates initial outward expansion, while a red dashed arrow marks a disrupted connection. The dashed curved path represents cognitive strain during redirection, ultimately resulting in a new anchor forming under pressure.