shapeofsoup
  • Monotropic Expansion
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework
    • 1.2 Purpose and Goals
    • 1.3 Monotropic Expansion Model
    • 1.4 Addressing Accessibility
    • 1.5 Paper Overview
    • 1.6 Positionality and Rationale
  • 2. Model Mechanism
    • 2.1 Anchoring
    • 2.2 Iterative Context Building
    • 2.3 Cognitive Inertia
    • 2.4 Directionality and Precision
    • 2.5 Scalability and Flexibility
  • 3. Neurological Foundation
    • 3.1 Salience Anchoring and Internal Relevance
    • 3.2 Attentional Modulation and Cognitive Inertia
    • 3.3 Predictive Coding and Inside-Out Construction
    • 3.4 Neurodevelopmental Trajectories and Structural Divergence
    • 3.5 Implications for Structural Modeling and Neuroethical Practice
  • 4. Theoretical Alignment
    • 4.1 Monotropism (Murray, Lesser, Lawson, 2005)
    • 4.2 Executive Dysfunction and Attentional Flexibility
    • 4.3. Weak Central Coherence (Frith, 1989)
    • 4.4. Theory of Mind (ToM) and the Assumption of Deficiency
    • 4.5. Language Processing and Internal Narrative
    • 4.6. Trauma, Inertia, and Pattern Reinforcement
    • 4.7. Double Empathy Problem (Milton, 2012)
    • 4.8. DSM-5 Framing and Pathologized Comparison
  • 5. Implications
    • 5.1. Diagnostic Framing and the Myth of Functioning Labels
    • 5.2. Coexisting Neurodivergent Conditions and Inertial Structures
    • 5.3. Rethinking Support and Accommodation
    • 5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical Misalignment
    • 5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects
    • 5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction
  • 6. Reframing Autism
    • 6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence
    • 6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language
    • 6.3. Implications for Language, Ethics, and Research
  • 7. Conclusion
  • 8. Update Log
  • Contact & Support
Powered by GitBook
On this page

5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects

Autistic individuals often experience chronic doubt around identity, authenticity, and self-worth. Monotropic cognition contributes to this not because it is faulty, but because it builds internal meaning through sustained coherence, making conflicting social input difficult to integrate or disregard.

Imposter syndrome, for example, can emerge when external recognition does not align with internal coherence. The individual may logically understand their success, but remain emotionally disconnected from it because the internal context has not anchored that experience as self-validating. Likewise, masking behaviors—often seen as deception or inauthenticity—may simply reflect incomplete anchoring or the temporary use of external scripts when natural navigation fails to materialize.

Communication challenges are often not the result of lacking empathy or awareness, but of a directionality mismatch. A monotropic individual may communicate from the inside out, expecting others to understand the context behind their statements, while others may expect communication to follow external cues or shared scripts. Misunderstandings emerge not from a lack of intent, but from incompatible anchoring assumptions.

Previous5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical MisalignmentNext5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction

Last updated 2 months ago