shapeofsoup
  • Monotropic Expansion
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Prevailing Deficit Framework
    • 1.2 Purpose and Goals
    • 1.3 Monotropic Expansion Model
    • 1.4 Addressing Accessibility
    • 1.5 Paper Overview
    • 1.6 Positionality and Rationale
  • 2. Model Mechanism
    • 2.1 Anchoring
    • 2.2 Iterative Context Building
    • 2.3 Cognitive Inertia
    • 2.4 Directionality and Precision
    • 2.5 Scalability and Flexibility
  • 3. Neurological Foundation
    • 3.1 Salience Anchoring and Internal Relevance
    • 3.2 Attentional Modulation and Cognitive Inertia
    • 3.3 Predictive Coding and Inside-Out Construction
    • 3.4 Neurodevelopmental Trajectories and Structural Divergence
    • 3.5 Implications for Structural Modeling and Neuroethical Practice
  • 4. Theoretical Alignment
    • 4.1 Monotropism (Murray, Lesser, Lawson, 2005)
    • 4.2 Executive Dysfunction and Attentional Flexibility
    • 4.3. Weak Central Coherence (Frith, 1989)
    • 4.4. Theory of Mind (ToM) and the Assumption of Deficiency
    • 4.5. Language Processing and Internal Narrative
    • 4.6. Trauma, Inertia, and Pattern Reinforcement
    • 4.7. Double Empathy Problem (Milton, 2012)
    • 4.8. DSM-5 Framing and Pathologized Comparison
  • 5. Implications
    • 5.1. Diagnostic Framing and the Myth of Functioning Labels
    • 5.2. Coexisting Neurodivergent Conditions and Inertial Structures
    • 5.3. Rethinking Support and Accommodation
    • 5.4. Therapy Approaches, Cognitive Models, and Ethical Misalignment
    • 5.5. Self-Perception, Identity, and Communication Disconnects
    • 5.6. Social Systems, Education, and Institutional Friction
  • 6. Reframing Autism
    • 6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence
    • 6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language
    • 6.3. Implications for Language, Ethics, and Research
  • 7. Conclusion
  • 8. Update Log
  • Contact & Support
Powered by GitBook
On this page

6.1. The Structural Model of Divergence

The Monotropic Expansion model challenges the foundational assumption that autism is best understood as a cluster of traits, impairments, or surface behaviors. Instead, it reframes autism as a structural divergence in cognitive directionality—a difference in how attention forms, anchors, and expands meaning through internally constructed context. This divergence is not an overlay on a neurotypical core, but an entirely different way of organizing perception, intention, and identity.

Where conventional models group behaviors and deficits into diagnostic criteria, Monotropic Expansion begins from cognitive architecture. It explains why traits commonly observed in autism—deep focus, social divergence, sensory sensitivity, executive dysfunction, delayed transitions—are not random or disordered but emerge naturally from a single, coherent mechanism of inside-out processing. This mechanism is not inherently dysfunctional; it becomes disabling only when systems are built to serve its opposite.

Thus, autism is not a collection of deficits. It is not a disorder of communication, of empathy, or of development. It is a structurally consistent mode of cognition—one that remains misunderstood only because it is measured against systems that reward polytropic fluency.

Previous6. Reframing AutismNext6.2. Moving Beyond Developmental Language

Last updated 2 months ago